Carlson v. Young
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The question presented by plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law from a denial by the Administrator of the Bureau of Workmen’s Compensation of plaintiff’s application for permanent partial disability is whether the plaintiff’s injury of February l, 1955, while travelling by bus to Cleveland for an examination in connection with such application, pursuant to an order of the Industrial Commission, is traceable to the course of and arising out of her employment and therefore covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Ohio.
The Industrial Commission of Ohio allowed plaintiff total…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Fitzgibbons v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Matter of Huhn v. Gehnrich Indirect Heat Oven Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
4Cited by7 opinions
- Hendrickson v. George Madsen Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Font v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Whitington v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Bankers Investment Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Woodrum v. Premier Auto Glass Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.