Legal Opinion

People v. Profumo

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1913No. Crim. No. 469PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the defendant of murder of the second degree and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The first point urged by the appellant is that the court erred in giving to the jury the following instruction upon the subject of dying declarations: “Whether the declaration was in fact made under a sense of impending death is a question of fact which most materially affects the question of its credibility, and the determination of the court thereon is not conclusive upon the jury. They have the right, in considering whether they shall accept…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. KeelinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. People v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API