Legal Opinion

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Duty

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1925No. 729-4336PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

Eor convenience the plaintiffs in error, Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Company and J. D. Lancaster and O. L. Wallace, receivers of the Texas Pacific Railway Company, will'be designated in this opinion as “appellants,” and the defendant in error, E. O. Duty, will be designated as “appellee.”

About 9 o’clock on the night of May 18, 1923, while appellee was driving across a public crossing over the railroad track of appellants in the city of El Paso, in a Ford automobile, said automobile was struck by a loco-1 motive of appellants, which was drawing a freight train of 17 cars on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Graham v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Railroad Commission v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Abbott v. AndrewsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Moncada v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API