Legal Opinion

Gartrell v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1935No. 24258, 24288PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Where a suit in damages for the homicide of a servant is brought against the master, the plaintiff has the burden of establishing negligence on the part of the master, and due care on the part of the deceased, and where the master is not a railroad company, all presumptions are in the master’s favor. Wing v. Savannah Guano Co., 17 Ga. App. 534 (87 S. E. 827), and cit.

2. “Except in case of railroad companies, the master is not liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business.” Civil Code (1910), § 3129; Buchsbaum v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wing v. Savannah Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Buchsbaum v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Miller v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Miller v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Carstarphen v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API