Legal Opinion

Cravens v. Skinner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1981No. 18520PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from judgment that the plaintiffs take nothing in their suit for treble damages and attorneys fees under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann. sec. 17.46 and sec. 17.50 (1977); or, in the alternative, actual damages for common law fraud.

We affirm.

Appellees have filed no brief, so we may accept as true the facts stated in appellant’s brief. Tex.R.Civ.P. 419.

On September 16, 1977, appellants paid appellees $3,150.00 for a ruby and a separate gold ring mounting. In response to appellants’ inquiry as to what would be the appraisal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Custom Leasing, Inc. v. Texas Bank & Trust Co. of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Spradling v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Oilwell Division, United States Steel Corp. v. FryerTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Freedom Homes of Texas, Inc. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Brooks, Tarlton, Gilbert, Douglas & Kressler, Etc., Cross-Appellants v. United States Fire Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Haralson v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Roberts v. U.S. Home Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  5. First National Bank of Kerrville v. Estate of Hackworth, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API