Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Crosland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 1966No. 16761PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RENFRO, Justice.

Appeal from a summary judgment for defendant.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged that he was in the business of operating filling stations as a sole proprietor, his method of operation was to purchase gasoline on credit, sell it to his customers, then pay his creditors with the proceeds of the sales; toward the end of 1958 plaintiff employed defendant as an independent accountant; his duties included, among other things, preparation of plaintiff’s income tax returns. In performing this function defendant relied upon the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gammel v. Ernst & ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Carrell v. DentonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Carrell v. DentonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  5. Bancroft v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hoover v. Gregory, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. University National Bank v. Ernst & Whinney, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  4. Robert Wooler Co. v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. LOCAL 1064, RWDSU AFL-CIO v. Ernst & YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API