Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stewart v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1923No. 23,983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.

The sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint to constitute a cause of action in mandamus is the sole question presented for consideration. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint of relators, as patrons of a certain school, to compel appellees, as the trustee of the township, and as the county superintendent of schools, respectively, to have the school wagon driven to relators’ homes for their children.

The complaint alleged, in substance, that relators lived in an abandoned school district, from which the trustee had undertaken to and was transporting the children of school age to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. v. Benton Township School Dist.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Lyle v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Brand v. MostadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heffner v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Boone v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Flowers v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. State v. WaltersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State v. School Dist. No. 7, Lewis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API