Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Hutchins. Jackson superior court. August term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

A petition was filed by Roberts and five others, under section 4760 of the Civil Code, for the removal of a pond of water which had collected upon the lands of W. O. Harrison. The jury returned a verdict finding the pond a nuisance, and the justices of the peace directed the sheriff or his deputy to enter upon the lands “and abate the nuisance complained of, by removing said pond in the most feasible manner.” The defendant carried the case by certiorari to the superior court. There the certiorari was sustained and the judgment of the justices set aside, .on the ground that while, in a sense,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peck v. HerringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Woodruff v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Brimberry v. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Mohr v. GaultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Virginia State EntomologistSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Cornett v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Whitt v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Evans v. Southern Holding Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Ken Cowden Chevrolet, Inc v. CortsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API