Legal Opinion

Drobnich v. Bach

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1924No. 23,889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages for the breach of a contract of marriage. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The testimony of the parties is in direct conflict. There are some infirmities in the testimony of each, and each has corroborating testimony or corroborating circumstances. The question was one of fact for the jury, and the verdict finding a marriage contract and its breach by the defendant is sustained.

An action for the breach of a marriage contract is in form on contract, but damages are awarded as in tort…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Bukowski v. KuzniaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waddell v. BriggsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Schoenecke v. RonningenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API