Legal Opinion
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 1996No. C5-94-1820, C7-94-1821Published
1Opinion of the Court
549 N.W.2d 904 (1996)
MINNEGASCO, A DIVISION OF NORAM ENERGY CORP., f/k/a/ Minnegasco, a Division of Arkla, Inc., Petitioner, Appellant,
Northern States Power Co., et al., Petitioners, Appellants,
v.
MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent,
Minnesota Alliance for Fair Competition, Respondent.
Nos. C5-94-1820, C7-94-1821.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 13, 1996.
Rehearing Denied July 18, 1996.
Margie E. Hendricksen, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for Respondent M.P.U.C.
James D. Larson, Wurst, Pearson, Larson, Underwood & Mertz, Minneapolis, for Respondent Minnesota Alliance for Fair Competition.
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Humphrey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.