Ruckman v. Hay
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lively, Judge:
This suit is for specific performance of a contract com*98promising an action at law, entered into by counsel representing the parties. The decree of October 12, 1921, . appealed from, sustained the demurrer to the bill and dismissed it for want of equity.
■Plaintiff, Ruckman, owned lots 22 and 23 of block 4 in the Round Barn Addition to the city of Elkins, and in 1907 conveyed them, with general warranty, to.Morgan for $850.00 cash.- At that time a prior vendor’s lien existed against the property of which Ruckman claims to have had no knowledge. Afterwards, Morgan, who is now dead,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. McCauslandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- Miller v. LorentzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Creigh's v. BoggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Moore, Keppel & Co. v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Krohn v. BantzIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spight v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
- Jones v. ShipleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
- Sponaugle v. WarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925