Legal Opinion

Ruckman v. Hay

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

This suit is for specific performance of a contract com*98promising an action at law, entered into by counsel representing the parties. The decree of October 12, 1921, . appealed from, sustained the demurrer to the bill and dismissed it for want of equity.

■Plaintiff, Ruckman, owned lots 22 and 23 of block 4 in the Round Barn Addition to the city of Elkins, and in 1907 conveyed them, with general warranty, to.Morgan for $850.00 cash.- At that time a prior vendor’s lien existed against the property of which Ruckman claims to have had no knowledge. Afterwards, Morgan, who is now dead,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McCauslandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Miller v. LorentzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Creigh's v. BoggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Moore, Keppel & Co. v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Krohn v. BantzIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spight v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jones v. ShipleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Sponaugle v. WarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API