Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Western Tube Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1896Published

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry V. Freeman, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

on petition for rehearing.

The petition says “ the court erroneously assumes that witnesses on the side of the appellant testified that the goods * * * were sold by the appellee to the Globe Steam Heating Company.”

The original brief of the appellee says, speaking of witnesses for the appellant, “ swore to the purchase of goods by that firm,” and the abstract states some of the testimony thus:

“ This (the note sued upon) is the renewal of a note that was given eight or nine months previous to this for a lot of goods that were ordered.”
“ The former note was given to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ames & Frost Co. v. StrachurskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sidwell v. LoblyIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Daube v. TennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. SwanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  5. Gallagher v. BrandtIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API