Legal Opinion

Domestic Rag Co. v. Cutler

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 11, 1959No. 461258PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action of contract upon a promissory note in the amount of $7,752.23. The defendant’s answer was a general denial; and also that there was no *36consideration for the note, and that it was procured from the defendant by false and fraudulent representation of the plaintiff.

At the trial there was evidence tending to show that:

For a number of years prior to 1955 the plaintiff corporation sold and delivered merchandise to the Lowell Wool Stock Corporation, which had its place oí business in Lowell, in which corporation, the defendant held the office of treasurer and was its principal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dolham v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Silver v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. First National Stores Inc. v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Codman v. DumaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Melotte v. TucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arlington Trust Co. v. PappalardoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  2. Barr v. MosesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Del Gaizo v. Dreyfus Properties, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API