Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keim v. Douglas County School District

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA0268Published

1Dissent

JUDGE TAUBMAN

dissenting.

¶ 47 Because I agree with the final agency decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ) that the respondent, Douglas County School District (the District), violated. Colorado’s Fair Campaign Practices. Act.(FCPA), § 1-45-117(l)(a)(II), C.R.S. 2014, when it contracted for and disseminated a report written by the American Enterprise Institute (the Hess Report), I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I conclude that the Hess Report was given, directly or indirectly, to reform school board candidates for the Douglas County School Board election in 2013.

¶ 48…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. American Library Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Tidwell v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. Colorado Ethics Watch v. Senate Majority Fund, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API