Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-160PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

Defendant, Douglas Baker, was charged with and convicted of first-degree burglary and second-degree robbery. On appeal, he challenges his burglary conviction, claiming that the elements of the offense were not met because a driveway does not satisfy the definition of “occupied structure.” He also claims he should not have been subject to the mandatory minimum sentence provisions of Iowa Code section 902.7 (1995). We conclude, based on the definition in section 702.12, a driveway satisfies the definition of an “occupied structure.” We also find there was substantial evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BumpusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. State v. OhnmachtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. State v. ConstableSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. State v. TeetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. State v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. State of Iowa v. David Howard RooneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. State v. BloomerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API