Legal Opinion

Omer v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1907Published

Appeal from Ralls Circuit Court. — Hon. David H. Eby, . Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.

The plaintiff was a passenger on defendant’s train. He, with three or four others, were seated in the baggage car with the consent and acquiescence of defendant, the baggage car being used by the defendant as a smoker for the accommodation of its passengers. At a point on defendant’s road between the cities of Hannibal and New London, where the railroad embankment is from four to six feet in height, the car on which plaintiff was being conveyed was' derailed and overturned down said embankment, whereby plaintiff was slightly but not seriously injured. The evidence tends to prove that he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Woody v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Charles H. Heer Dry-Goods Co. v. Citizens Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Ghio v. BeardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API