Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Adams v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1971No. 369S41Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion

DeBruler, J.

For the reasons set out hereafter in this opinion, I cannot vote to sustain the constitutionality of the death penalty. Death as a form of punishment is forbidden by both the Indiana and the United States Constitutions. The first part of this opinion deals with the claim that Art. 1, § 18 of the Indiana Constitution, requiring as it does that the penal code be based upon principles of reformation, prohibits the death penalty. The second part of this opinion deals with the claim that the death penalty is cruel and unusual and as *75such is in violation…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API