Legal Opinion

Spiro v. Felton

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee

Decided March 20, 1896No. 995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, District Judge.

It is urged as ground for a new trial in this case that the court allowed plaintiff to prove the number of and ages of the children. It is certainly true that, as a general proposition of law, such evidence would not be relevant. As the right of action given in eases like this for death of a person is, under the statute (Mill. & V. Code, § 3130), “for the benefit of his widow or *92next of kin, free from the claims of creditors,” and as by the act of 1883, c. 186 (Code, § 3134), damages are also given to the parties for whose use and benefit the right of action survives,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Elliott v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  2. Duke v. St. Louis & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API