Legal Opinion

Smith v. Childs

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1993No. Docket 133984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Defendant Francis Childs appeals as of right the judgment entered against him pursuant to a jury’s verdict. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s now deceased husband purchased a life insurance policy from defendant Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company through defendant Childs, an employee of defendant Farm Bureau Marketing Corporation. On the application, the decedent falsely stated that he had not been convicted of three or more speeding offenses in the previous three years, when in fact he had been convicted of over a dozen.

Plaintiff’s husband was killed in a motor vehicle accident. Farm Bureau Life refused…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Theophelis v. Lansing General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Geib v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wildey v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Felsner v. McDonald Rent-A-Car, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Grant v. Stecker & Huff, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rogers v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Freed v. SalasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Keator v. GaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Pallante v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Appleton Chinese Food Service, Inc. v. Murken InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API