Legal Opinion

Mikhail Lyasko v. Evgeny Aleksandrovich Chernyshev

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 15, 2026No. 3:25-cv-09756Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MIKHAIL LYASKO, Case No. 25-cv-09756-RFL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND EVGENY ALEKSANDROVICH CHERNYSHEV, Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendant. Lyasko’s claims were previously dismissed with leave to amend because they were time- barred by a three-year statute of limitations under California law. (See Dkt. No. 30 (the “Prior Order”).) In his amended complaint, Lyasko brings the same claims as before, but he now asserts those claims under Russian law. Chernyshev moves to dismiss, arguing, among other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G and G Productions LLC v. Rita RusicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Bogdan Radu v. Persephone Johnson ShonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API