Legal Opinion

ESFANDIARY

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1979No. ID 2685PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2685 MATTER OF ESFANDIARY In Deportation Proceedings A-18815373 Decided by Board January 17, 1979 (1) The first step in determining whether a crime involves moral turpitude is to determine from the record of conviction what law, or portion of law, was violated. (2) When a statute encompasses both violations which do and those that do not necessarily involve moral turpitude, the record of conviction (i.e., the charge, plea, verdict, and sentence) must be examined for a determination of whether the crime committed involves moral turpitude. (3) Where respondent's conviction of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Juan Quilodran-Brau v. J. W. Holland, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. Marie Germaine Rose Anna Bisaillon v. William A. Hogan, District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service, HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1971
  4. United States Ex Rel. Teper v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  5. NBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. SHORTBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  2. AJAMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  3. VELAZQUEZ-HERRERABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
  4. LOPEZ-MEZABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  5. PICHARDOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API