Wetmore v. Wetmore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, William Boerum Wetmore, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the Tfch day of October, 1896, denying his motion for an order to be made at the foot of the judgment in the action, modifying such judgment by directing the trustee to pay a portion of the surplus income of the trust estate for the support and maintenance of the defendant, William Boerum…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant, William Boerum Wetmore, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the Tfch day of October, 1896, denying his motion for an order to be made at the foot of the judgment in the action, modifying such judgment by directing the trustee to pay a portion of the surplus income of the trust estate for the support and maintenance of the defendant, William Boerum Wetmore.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
On the 12tli of June, 1890, an action was commenced in this court by the above-named plaintiff against the defendant William B. Wetmore for a divorce on the ground of adultery, and the summons in that action was served upon the defendant William B. Wetmore personally in this State. William B. Wetmore answered in that action, and the case was subsequently tried, and resulted in the entry of a judgment on or about April 8, 1892, dissolving the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant William B. Wet-more and granting an absolute divorce, awarding the custody of the three…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Wetmore v. WetmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899