TIMBISHA SHOSHONE TRIBE v. Salazar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:
Individuals claiming to be the Tribal Council of the Timbisha Shoshone appeal the district court’s dismissal of their case for failure to state a claim, but we do not reach that issue because we conclude the plaintiffs lack standing. We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to dismiss their complaint for lack of jurisdiction.
I
In 1951, certain members of the Shoshone tribes sued the United States over the loss of their lands. See United States v. Dann, 470 U.S. 39, 41, 105 S.Ct. 1058,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cayuga Nation v. TannerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Shabtai Shatsky v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Cayuga Nation v. BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Zivotofsky Ex Rel. Ari Z. v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Nation v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.