Halsted v. Buster
Supreme Court of the United States
EÉROR TO. THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT /IF WEST VIRGINIA. The cáse is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer
This case has been in this court once before. - A judgment in favor of the defendants was reversed on account of an error in pleading. Halsted v. Buster, 119 U. S. 341. On its return to the trial court the pleadings were amended, and the case proceeded to trial before a jury. The judgment and verdict were a second time in favor of defendants, and again plaintiff alleges error.
The facts are these: Upon an entry made April 12, 1785, and a survey in pursuance thereof, August 24, 1794, a patent issued, on July 22,1795, from the Commonwealth of Yirginia, for two thousand acres, to Albert Gallatin…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Armstrong v. MorrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Halsted v. BusterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lessee of Scott and Others v. Ratliffe and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Bryan v. WillardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Farnsworth v. DuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Stockton v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Highland Park Mfg. Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. GillilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.