Legal Opinion

Karstetter v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 2022No. 1:20-cv-01603Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JENNIFER ANN KARSTETTER, : CIVIL ACTION: 1:20-CV-01603 : Plaintiff, : (Magistrate Judge Schwab) : v. : : KILOLO KIJAKAZI1 : Acting Commissioner of : Social Security, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction. Plaintiff Jennifer Ann Karstetter (“Karstetter”) seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for Supplemental Security income benefits under XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under

42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3).…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API