Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strasser v. Character & Fitness Committee of the Kentucky Office of Bar Admissions

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2005No. 2004-SC-1088-KBPublished

1DissentWintersheimer, Justice

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion that conditionally admits the movant to the practice of law in Kentucky because the Character and Fitness Committee has thoroughly considered all the evidence in this matter and correctly concluded that she has not met her burden of proof to establish fitness to practice law.

This Court has plenary and exclusive authority to regulate the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. This power brings the responsibility of safeguarding the public interest from admitting lawyers to the practice of law that possess insufficient character…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Disbarment of IssermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. In re DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Clark v. Virginia Board of Bar ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  4. In re PragerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Lane v. Bar Commission of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API