Legal Opinion

Drury v. Wolfe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;— . heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. John J. Glenn, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scholfield

Wolfe being indebted to Drury, $8000, for loaned money, gave him his four promissory notes therefor, as follows: One for $2000, payable one year after date; one for $2500, payable two years after date; one for $2500, payable three years after date; and one for'$3275.80, payable four years after date,—all bearing interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum after due. The rate of interest then allowed by our statute for money loaned was ten per cent per annum, and any sum charged for the use of money greater than that rate would produce, was usury. The question is, under that statute is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McFadden v. FortierIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Leonard v. Administrator of VillarsIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Thayer v. Wilmington Star Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Colbo v. BuyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Goodale v. WallaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Levens v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Bowman v. NeelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API