NATIONSBANC MORTGAGE CORP. v. Luptak

I agree with the majority that, under MCR 3.101, the writ of garnishment provided adequate notice of the nature of the proceedings to garnishee defendant, the Korn Family Limited Partnership (kflp). Our Supreme Court held long ago that a writ of garnishment alleging that the garnishee has property, money, and so forth, in its hands or under its control belonging to the defendant is sufficient, and more detail regarding why the garnishee is liable is not required. Connor v Third Nat’l Bank of Detroit, *56990 Mich 328, 333-334; 51 NW 523 (1892). I disagree, however, that a transfer is not “void”…