Borden Co. v. Liddy
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Per curiam
Because of a slight variance in views on some aspects of this case, individual Memorandums have been prepared and are attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Memorandum of Judge Hanson, which was prepared first, sets out the facts of the situation and these are adopted as the Court’s statement.
1. As the several Memorandums indicate, the Court is unanimous in its view that the defendant cannot prohibit the sale in commerce of the plaintiff’s 10% milkfat product within the State of Iowa upon the basis that the branding of it as “ice cream” constitutes a labeling violation under §§ 189.9,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.