Legal Opinion

United States v. Albarenga-Villalobo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 2004No. 04-20399PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Alfredo Albarenga-Villalobo (Albarenga) appeals from his sentence imposed on a guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry. The district court imposed a 58-month term of imprisonment, followed by a three-year term of supervised release.

For the first time on appeal, Albarenga contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As Albarenga concedes, this issue is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 247, 118…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Altschul, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  2. De La Cruz-Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Altschul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. United States v. AltschulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API