United States v. Albarenga-Villalobo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Alfredo Albarenga-Villalobo (Albarenga) appeals from his sentence imposed on a guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry. The district court imposed a 58-month term of imprisonment, followed by a three-year term of supervised release.
For the first time on appeal, Albarenga contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As Albarenga concedes, this issue is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 247, 118…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Altschul, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- De La Cruz-Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Altschul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. AltschulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.