Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Feifer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 8, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

All objections are overruled which relate to the schedules reporting collection of assets. All objections are overruled so far as they relate to the direct funeral expenses and the cost of services at the grave. By consent of the accounting administrator the expenditure for a headstone for the wife of deceased is disallowed and the administrator is surcharged with the amount thereof.

The objection made to an expenditure of $100 for the saying of Kaddish is sustained on the ground that this expenditure was voluntarily made by the accounting administrator, a son of the deceased, for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of SilversteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. In re the Estate of BrodyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of EhretNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API