Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Billingsly

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 15, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice

Affirming.

T. A. Ennis brought this suit against George Billingsly to recover 8/10 of an acre of land. Billingsly denied the title of plaintiff, and pleaded title in himself. From a judgment in favor of Billingsly, Ennis ■appeals.

Ennis and Billingsly are adjoining landowners. Lying between tbe two tracts at the place of dispute is-the South Fork of Beaver creek. All the deeds in Billingsly’s title give the “South Fork of Beaver creek, thence down said creek,” as the- western boundary of his tract of land. Although it is stipulated that the-deed under which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. McNabbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Stephenson Lumber Co. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Burnett v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Pratt v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Overton Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hensley v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Fife v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API