Legal Opinion

Buzick Construction, Inc. v. Sullivan & Cozart, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 21, 2026No. 3:22-cv-00105Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-00105-DJH-CHL BUZICK CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. SULLIVAN & COZART, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the Motion to Compel and the Motion to Supplement filed by Plaintiff Buzick Construction, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (DNs 90, 96.) Defendant Sullivan & Cozart, Inc. (“Defendant”) has filed a Response. (DN 101.) Plaintiff has not filed a reply and the time to do so has passed. Therefore, these Motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Minco, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Cygnus Therapeutics Systems v. Alza CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API