Field v. Hudson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Bernalillo County; Raynolds, Judge. Action for partition by Mary Lester Field against Clarence A. Hudson. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment after mandate denied, and new commissioners to partition tbe land appointed, her exceptions to a report overruled, and there was a decree for a sale, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT.
ROBERTS, J.
This action was instituted in the court below by appellant against appellee for the partition of lots 13 and 14, block 2, Perea addition to Albuquerque, N. M., such lots being owned by the parties as tenants in common. Appellant sought a partition in kind. The appellee asked for a sale of the lots. Commissioners .were appointed to make a partition, and reported that the property consisted of two unimproved lots of no appreciable difference in value; that sold together they would bring $100 more than if sold separately; that plaintiff was the owner of lots…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. LanningIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- McClanahan v. HockmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Hall v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Watke v. StineIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Field v. HudsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Prude v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Marquez v. MarquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965