Legal Opinion
Caswell v. Gibbs
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal in Chancery from Mason Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Marston, J:
We do not deem it necessary to discuss the various questions raised in this case, as we are in the outset met with some serious difficulties in the way of granting the relief prayed for.
The bill was filed to restrain defendant from violating the following contract:
“Whereas Caswell and Breinig have heretofore released Gibbs and Maxim from a contract for towing and delivering logs, now, in consideration thereof, I, Chauncey Gibbs, do hereby agree that I will never tow vessels in competition with said Caswell and Breinig, or either of them.
“Dated at Ludington, Michigan, this 19th day…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by11 opinions
- Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Cummer v. ButtsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Lone Star Salt Co. v. Texas Short Line Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. NemnichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.