Legal Opinion

Linderholm v. Ekblad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1914No. 18,408PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Per curiam

This is an original action in the nature of quo warranto brought by the plaintiff, Justus B. Linderholm, tb oust the defendant from the office of guardian of the plaintiff, “alleged insane.” Four reasons are assigned as a basis for the actionFirst, that the probate court had no jurisdiction to appoint the guardian; second, that the plaintiff had no notice of the hearing in the probate court and no opportunity to be present in person or by attorney; third, that the district court had no jurisdiction to proceed with the trial for the reason that there had been no proper finding of insanity in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Trotter v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freeburne v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. State of Kansas v. LinderholmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Linderholm v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API