Legal Opinion
Robert E. Hanson v. Hunt Oil Company, a Foreign Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1973No. 73-1669PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter comes before the court upon a motion pursuant to our Eighth Circuit Rule 9(b) for summary dismissal of an appeal taken from an order of the district court dismissing portions of the complaint. We conclude that this court is without jurisdiction and we grant the motion.
This litigation arises from a contract and side agreement for a unitization project (the Tioga-Madison Unit) designed to consolidate and thereby increase the production of oil in North Dakota. In 1966, Robert E. Hanson filed an action to reform the contract and for an accounting, and Hunt Oil filed a counterclaim for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alabama Labor Council, Aflcio, Public Employees Union, Local No. 1279 v. The State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Robert E. Hanson v. Hunt Oil Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Dale C. Richardson v. Communications Workers of America, Dale C. Richardson v. Communications Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Robert E. Hanson v. Hunt Oil Company, Hunt Industries v. Robert E. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by17 opinions
- Miguel Antonio Aparicio v. Swan Lake, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Braden v. University of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Myles v. LaffitteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Myles v. LaffitteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Joshua Munroe v. Continental Western InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.