Legal Opinion
Szabo v. Keeshin Motor Express Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 5, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 26443PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
These are actions for damages for personal injuries.
The same question is presented in both actions by defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaints for lack of jurisdiction of the persons of the individual defendants, to dismiss for insufficiency of service of process and to quash the service of process.
The Keeshin Company is in receivership and two individual trustees have been appointed by a Federal Court in Illinois. The trustees are residents of Illinois and they have not been personally served in either case. Service in both cases was made on Keeshin on November 16,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peeples v. RamspacherDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939
- O'Leary v. LoftinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Statler v. BabcockDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Marple Community Record, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Gipson v. Township of Bass RiverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1979
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Tropic Builders, Ltd. v. Naval Ammunition Depot Lualualei Quarters, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
- State Highway Administration v. KeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.