Legal Opinion

State v. McClanahan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 18, 1990No. 63,821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

Defendant Thomas L. McClanahan appeals from his jury conviction of indecent liberties with a child (K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 21-3503[l][a] or [b]) committed in November to December 1987.

At trial, the State introduced damning hearsay evidence, testimonial evidence of out-of-court statements made by the child victim declarant, L.S., to prove the truth of the matter stated. The evidence was admitted under the K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 60-460(dd) hearsay exception.

Presently pertinent are these statutory provisions:

K.S.A. 60-407

“Except as otherwise provided by statute (a) every person is qualified to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. State v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. State v. SiardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cardenas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cardenas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API