Legal Opinion

Bateman Ex Rel. Rodrigues v. Mello

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 17, 1992No. 91-614-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FAY, Chief Justice.

This case comes before us on appeal by the plaintiff from a Superior Court decision granting the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The plaintiff, Elaine Bateman, as mother and next friend of Anthony Rodrigues (Anthony), claims that the trial justice erred (1) by excluding the testimony of the plaintiff’s safety engineer regarding whether the condition in question constituted an attractive nuisance and (2) by granting the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case. For the reasons stated herein, we deny the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CastoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  2. Barenbaum v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  4. Brenner Associates, Inc. v. RousseauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  5. Cobe v. HerseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferland Corp. v. BouchardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  2. Hill v. National GridSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. Kessler v. MortensonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Lauer v. Millville Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Steven T. Burton v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API