Exstrum v. Union Casualty and Life Insurance Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentYeager, J.
I find no difficulty in concurring in the result arrived at by the majority opinion. I cannot however agree with much of the reasoning employed in arriving at that result.
I do not disagree with the conclusion that the group insurance policy which is the basis of the controversy in this action is subject to interpretation and application of the Illinois insurance code and the pertinent decisions of the courts of Illinois, provided reference thereto becomes necessary. If however the terms of the policy and other documents, which must in the very nature of things be looked to for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Koehn v. Union Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- O'NEIL v. Union National Life Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Peony Park, Inc. v. Security InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Serven v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Jensen v. Lincoln Hail InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.