Legal Opinion

Maness v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 11, 1970No. Docket Nos. 3617-68, 5719-69Published

Held, expenses incurred by petitioner in connection with his campaigns for State senator are not deductible under either sec. 162(a) or sec. 212(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

1Opinion of the Court

William H. Maness and Betty R. Maness, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Maness v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 3617-68, 5719-69

United States Tax Court

54 T.C. 1602; 1970 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 82;

August 11, 1970, Filed

Decisions will be entered for the respondent.

Held, expenses incurred by petitioner in connection with his campaigns for State senator are not deductible under either sec. 162(a) or sec. 212(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

William H. Maness, pro se.

Frank B. Metcalf, for the respondent.

Bruce, Judge.

BRUCE

This proceeding involves deficiencies in Federal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDonald v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Henry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  3. Lucas v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Charles D. Long and Gertrude G. Long v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. Reed v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API