Legal Opinion
Zackery v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided August 4, 2003No. A03A1313PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
A jury convicted Darrell Zackery of possession of cocaine. The trial court denied his motion for new trial. Zackery appeals, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, and that the trial court erred in admitting police officers’ testimony regarding Zackery’s incriminating exclamation. We disagree and affirm.
*647On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. Paul v. State, 231 Ga. App. 528 (499 SE2d 914) (1998). We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determine…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Haggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Rambo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Maness v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Owens v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.