Legal Opinion
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Iyax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 17, 2006No. CV-06-4474-SGL(JCX)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
LARSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are plaintiffs Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc., AR Scientific, Inc., and AR Holding Company, Inc.’s (collectively “Mutual”) motion for a preliminary injunction, defendants Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Ivax”), Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Zenith”) and intervenor Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA’s (“Teva”) opposition thereto, and Mutual’s reply. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for preliminary injunction is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Mutual’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chacanaca v. QUAKER OATS COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In Re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Epogen & Aranesp Offlabel Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hodges Consulting, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Nutrition Distribution LLC v. Custom Nutraceuticals LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.