Harrison v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Judge.
The defendant appeals, pro se, his conviction of the offense of being an habitual violator.
l.(a) Defendant first argues the indictment was insufficient because it did not allege a date, time or place. The record shows, however, that defendant, who was represented by counsel of his own choosing at trial, waived indictment and the State proceeded on an accusation as to which defendant entered a plea of guilty. The record also shows that the accusation plainly stated the nature of the offense charged, including the county where it occurred and the date of occurrence. “ ‘A plea of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skomer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Hilliard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Walker v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Wharton v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- United States v. Gutierrez-BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007