Legal Opinion

In re Sirrett

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for appointment of receiver after > examination of judgment debtors in proceedings supplemental to execution.

1Opinion of the CourtSpring, J.

Judgment was recovered in 1884 in favor of the plaintiff and against the present judgment debtors, and execution was issued thereon shortly thereafter and returned unsatisfied. After the lapse of ten years from the return of this execution the usual order was granted in proceedings supplementary to execution requiring the judgment debtors to appear before the referee appointed in the order and submit to an examination as to their property. That order was vacated ex parte by the justice granting it, and the ex parte order was sustained at Special Term upon a motion to vacate it. The order of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brassington v. RohrsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  2. Davis v. HerrigNew York Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Examination of StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Mede v. MeyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1907
  3. Burke v. BurkeNew York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API