Legal Opinion

The Sir William Peel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1867PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

72 U.S. 517 (____)

5 Wall. 517

THE SIR WILLIAM PEEL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Messrs. Evarts and Marvin, with whom was Mr. A.F. Smith, for the claimants.

Mr. Ashton, Assistant Attorney-General for the United States, and Mr. Eames, for the captors, contra.

The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

Regularly in cases of prize no evidence is admissible on the first hearing, except that which comes from the ship, either in the papers or the testimony of persons found on board.

If upon this evidence the case is not sufficiently clear to warrant condemnation or restitution, opportunity…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cushing v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. The" Florida"Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. The Olinde RodriguesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. The "Florida"Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. The New FoundlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API