Legal Opinion

Pinkney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1976No. 8752PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted after a nonjury trial of carrying a pistol without a license. He challenges his conviction on the ground that the court erred in refusing to suppress the pistol the prosecution introduced against him at trial. The police had seized the pistol, immediately after arresting appellant pursuant to a warrant, from the auto he had been driving at the time of arrest.

The record reflects that a trio of police officers were on duty in the early morning hours of February 23, 1974, seeking to locate various persons for whom they had bench warrants. One such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Raymond J. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Samuel F. ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Barry David KayeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. StaglianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Jacobs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Pinkney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API