Legal Opinion
Tamara B. v. Pete F.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 24, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Family Court, New York County (Ruth Zuckerman, J.), entered on or about April 28, 1994, which denied petitioner’s motion for a new trial in this paternity proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A prior effort by petitioner to have DNA tests performed on herself, respondent and the subject child was rejected by this Court in its remand of the case for the purpose of allowing respondent to introduce rebuttal expert testimony on the interpretation of HLA blood tests (Tamara B. v Pete F., 157 AD2d 636, amdg Tamara B. v Pete F., 146 AD2d 487). The issue of whether there should be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Tamara B. v. Pete F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Teichner v. W & J Holsteins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Cizler v. CizlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Tamara B. v. Pete F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nichols v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. WillockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. WillockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Nichols v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013