Legal Opinion
State in Interest of DH
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 29, 1976Published
1Opinion of the Court
139 N.J. Super. 330 (1976)
353 A.2d 570
STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D.H., J.P. AND E.R., JUVENILES.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, Bergen County.
January 29, 1976.
Mr. Nathan Beck for applicant (Messrs. Davis, Roth & Beck, attorneys).
Mr. Matthew J. Catania, Assistant Public Defender for D.H., juvenile (Mr. Stanley Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Mr. Frank Piscatella for J.P., juvenile.
Mr. James A. Breslin, Jr. attorney for E.R., juvenile.
DI GISI, P.J.J.D.R.C.
The within application involves three juveniles who had similar complaints filed against them…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McDonald v. Home Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- The Township of Hopewell, a Municipal Corporation v. John Volpe, Secretary of the Department of Transportation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- State v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Zuckerbrod v. BurchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.